The Manager of Joonak Roofing is earlier than the Amasaman Circuit Court over alleged GH¢14,000.00 fraud.
Clement Acquah Jonah is alleged to have taken the cash from Nana Offei beneath the pretext of supplying him with a amount of roofing sheets which he has denied, based on prosecutors.
He was granted a GH¢50,000.00 bail with two sureties.
The Court ordered the sureties to supply their legitimate nationwide id playing cards to the Court’s Registry.
Acquah would make his subsequent look on April 6, 2025 and the Court has ordered Prosecution to serve him with the required supplies for Case Management Conference.
Police Chief Inspector Frederick Ansah-Awuah instructed the Court presided over by Ms Enid Marful-Sau that Nana Offei, the Complainant was an Accountant and resident of Sarpeiman while Acquah, the accused particular person, was a resident of Kasoa.
He stated on October 16, 2024, the Complainant contracted accused one who claimed to be a supervisor of Joonak Roofing to roof his three buildings at Adjen Kotoku for him.
Prosecution stated after negotiation, the accused particular person charged the complainant GH¢14,000.00 which was paid in full to the accused particular person.
Chief Inspector Awuah-Ansah stated the accused particular person went to a sister Company to purchase the roofing sheet with the standard of three.0 as an alternative of the 4.5 agreed on to roof two buildings, leaving one constructing with an excuse that his firm had an issue.
The Court heard that each one efforts made to get accused particular person to roof the remaining proved futile.
Since he failed to select Complainant’s calls, the Complainant used a special cellphone line to contact him, tricking him to consider he was giving him one other contract which he responded, resulting in his arrest.
After crucial investigation, the accused particular person was charged with the offence.
His counsel, in praying for bail, stated it was a contractual settlement, and his consumer was ready to attend Court to show his innocence.
His stated the consumer was not identified (first time offender), gainfully employed, including that he had women and men of considerable means to face as sureties.
Source: GNA